B & Ors, R (on the application of) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal
The IPT's decision is not amenable to judicial review because it does not affect the Claimants' legal position; the Administrative Court is the proper forum to determine privacy protections for its proceedings and documents, and is not bound by the IPT's views or orders.
- Parties
- Claimants: B and others; Defendant: Investigatory Powers Tribunal; Interested Party: His Majesty’s Customs and Excise
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 July 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Rolled Up Hearing: Permission and Substantive Application
- Outcome
- Permission granted; substantive application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Open Justice, Privacy Protections, Judicial Review, Reporting Restrictions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
B and others
Claimants
Investigatory Powers Tribunal
Defendant
His Majesty’s Customs and Excise
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Rolled Up Hearing: Permission and Substantive Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the IPT's decision on privacy protections is amenable to judicial review
- 2 Whether the Administrative Court or IPT determines privacy protections for documents and proceedings
- 3 Effect of IPT privacy orders on subsequent Administrative Court proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
The IPT's decision is not amenable to judicial review because it does not affect the Claimants' legal position; the Administrative Court is the proper forum to determine privacy protections for its proceedings and documents, and is not bound by the IPT's views or orders.
Court Disposition
Permission granted; substantive application dismissed
Orders
- Permission to apply for judicial review granted
- Application for judicial review dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment