Privacy International, R (On the Application Of) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal
Section 67(8) of RIPA is a clear and unambiguous ouster clause that excludes judicial review of decisions of the IPT, except to the extent that the Act itself provides for appeals. The statutory scheme confers exclusive jurisdiction on the IPT for the subject matter, and the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction is ousted for the relevant decisions. The future introduction of a statutory right of appeal (section 67A) will alter this position, but until then, judicial review does not lie against IPT decisions.
- Parties
- Claimant: Privacy International; Defendant: Investigatory Powers Tribunal; Interested Party: Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs; Interested Party: Government Communications Headquarters
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 February 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Preliminary Issue on Amenability to Judicial Review
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed; IPT decision not amenable to judicial review under current law.
- Legal Topics
- Ouster Clauses, Judicial Review of Tribunal Decisions, Jurisdiction of Specialist Tribunals, Interpretation of Statutory Provisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Privacy International
Claimant
Investigatory Powers Tribunal
Defendant
Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs
Interested Party
Government Communications Headquarters
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Preliminary Issue on Amenability to Judicial Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 67(8) of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA) ousts the jurisdiction of the High Court to judicially review decisions of the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT)
- 2 Whether the IPT's decision is amenable to judicial review in the absence of a statutory right of appeal
Ratio Decidendi
Section 67(8) of RIPA is a clear and unambiguous ouster clause that excludes judicial review of decisions of the IPT, except to the extent that the Act itself provides for appeals. The statutory scheme confers exclusive jurisdiction on the IPT for the subject matter, and the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction is ousted for the relevant decisions. The future introduction of a statutory right of appeal (section 67A) will alter this position, but until then, judicial review does not lie against IPT decisions.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed; IPT decision not amenable to judicial review under current law.
Orders
- The claim for judicial review is dismissed.
- No order for judicial review of the IPT's decision.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment