Budea, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 1287 (01 August 2025)

Budea, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 1287 (01 August 2025)

The sentencing judge correctly categorised the offences, applied the relevant guidelines, imposed consecutive sentences with appropriate adjustment for totality, and was justified in finding dangerousness and imposing extended sentences; the sentence was not manifestly excessive or wrong in principle.

Citation
[2025] EWCA Crim 1287
Parties
Prosecution: R; Applicant: Ioan Budea
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
01 August 2025
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
renewed application for leave to appeal against sentence refused; application for extension of time refused
Legal Topics
Attempted Murder, Wounding With Intent, Possession of Bladed Article, Sentencing, Extended Sentence, Dangerousness, Totality Principle

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

R

Prosecution

Ioan Budea

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the total custodial term of 20 years with an extended licence period of three years was manifestly excessive or wrong in principle
  2. 2 Whether the judge erred in categorisation of offences and application of sentencing guidelines
  3. 3 Whether consecutive sentences were appropriate

Ratio Decidendi

The sentencing judge correctly categorised the offences, applied the relevant guidelines, imposed consecutive sentences with appropriate adjustment for totality, and was justified in finding dangerousness and imposing extended sentences; the sentence was not manifestly excessive or wrong in principle.

Court Disposition

renewed application for leave to appeal against sentence refused; application for extension of time refused