R v Ioan Budea
The judge's categorisation of the offences, application of consecutive sentences, reduction for totality, and imposition of extended sentences were correct in principle and justified by the facts. The sentence was not manifestly excessive or wrong in principle.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Ioan Budea; Complainant: Marina Afonina; Victim: Joseph Tipler
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 September 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- renewed application for leave to appeal against sentence refused; application for extension of time refused
- Legal Topics
- Attempted Murder, Wounding With Intent, Possession of a Bladed Article, Sentencing, Dangerousness, Totality, Extended Sentence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Ioan Budea
Applicant
Marina Afonina
Complainant
Joseph Tipler
Victim
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive or wrong in principle
- 2 Whether the judge correctly categorised the offences under Sentencing Council guidelines
- 3 Whether consecutive sentences and extended licence periods were justified
Ratio Decidendi
The judge's categorisation of the offences, application of consecutive sentences, reduction for totality, and imposition of extended sentences were correct in principle and justified by the facts. The sentence was not manifestly excessive or wrong in principle.
Court Disposition
renewed application for leave to appeal against sentence refused; application for extension of time refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment