Nokia Oyj (Nokia Corporation) v IPCom GmbH & Co Kg
The 268 patent is not invalid for obviousness, added matter, or insufficiency. The modifications required to render the invention obvious over GSM/GPRS, IS-95, Farsta/Thomas, or common general knowledge were not ones the skilled person would make without invention. The patent as amended does not add matter. The specification is sufficient. Nokia's A1 and A2 devices infringe the patent; B-G devices do not infringe and Nokia is entitled to declarations of non-infringement for those devices. IPCom is not entitled to a declaration regarding UMTS compliance.
- Parties
- Claimant: Nokia Oyj (Nokia Corporation); Defendant: IPCom GmbH & Co KG
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 June 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Patent Revocation and Infringement / Judgment After Full Trial
- Outcome
- Patent held valid and partially infringed; declarations of non-infringement granted for certain devices; IPCom's request for declaration on UMTS compliance refused.
- Legal Topics
- Patent Validity, Patent Infringement, Obviousness, Added Matter, Insufficiency, Declaration of Non Infringement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nokia Oyj (Nokia Corporation)
Claimant
IPCom GmbH & Co KG
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Patent Revocation and Infringement / Judgment After Full Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether European Patent (UK) No. 1 841 268 is invalid for obviousness, added matter, or insufficiency
- 2 Whether Nokia's devices infringe the 268 patent
- 3 Whether Nokia is entitled to declarations of non-infringement for certain devices
Ratio Decidendi
The 268 patent is not invalid for obviousness, added matter, or insufficiency. The modifications required to render the invention obvious over GSM/GPRS, IS-95, Farsta/Thomas, or common general knowledge were not ones the skilled person would make without invention. The patent as amended does not add matter. The specification is sufficient. Nokia's A1 and A2 devices infringe the patent; B-G devices do not infringe and Nokia is entitled to declarations of non-infringement for those devices. IPCom is not entitled to a declaration regarding UMTS compliance.
Court Disposition
Patent held valid and partially infringed; declarations of non-infringement granted for certain devices; IPCom's request for declaration on UMTS compliance refused.
Orders
- 268 patent held valid and infringed by Nokia A1 and A2 devices
- Declaration of non-infringement granted for Nokia B-G devices
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment