LENKOR ENERGY TRADING DMCC v IRFAN IQBAL PURI
The Angel Bell exception should not be removed and fortification should not be discharged as there is no enforceable English judgment; Bankers’ Books Inspection Order is granted for specified accounts and periods, but broader disclosure and use of information for enforcement abroad are premature.
- Parties
- Claimant: Lenkor Energy Trading DMCC; Defendant: Irfan Iqbal Puri
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 July 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Debt Enforcement / Interlocutory Applications Following Foreign Judgment
- Outcome
- Applications to remove Angel Bell exception and discharge fortification denied; Bankers’ Books Inspection Order granted in limited scope; parties to draft order to give effect to judgment.
- Legal Topics
- Freezing Injunctions, Enforcement of Foreign Judgments, Bankers’ Books Inspection Orders, Disclosure, Asset Preservation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lenkor Energy Trading DMCC
Claimant
Irfan Iqbal Puri
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Debt Enforcement / Interlocutory Applications Following Foreign Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to remove the Angel Bell exception from the freezing injunction
- 2 Whether to discharge the requirement for fortification of the cross undertaking in damages
- 3 Whether to permit use of information obtained for enforcement proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
The Angel Bell exception should not be removed and fortification should not be discharged as there is no enforceable English judgment; Bankers’ Books Inspection Order is granted for specified accounts and periods, but broader disclosure and use of information for enforcement abroad are premature.
Court Disposition
Applications to remove Angel Bell exception and discharge fortification denied; Bankers’ Books Inspection Order granted in limited scope; parties to draft order to give effect to judgment.
Orders
- Angel Bell exception retained in freezing injunction.
- Requirement for fortification of cross undertaking in damages maintained.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment