IS Innovative Software Ltd v Howes [2004] EWCA Civ 275 (19 February 2004)
Mr Howes was not liable for unlawful means conspiracy because he did not intend to injure the company and reasonably believed the backdated contracts reflected existing agreements; he was not liable for inducing breach of contract or conspiracy as the evidence did not establish that employees breached their...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2004] EWCA Civ 275
- Parties
- Appellant: IS Innovative Software Ltd; Respondent: Robert Howes
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 February 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Unlawful Means Conspiracy, Inducement of Breach of Contract, Variation of Employment Contracts, Employee Duties, Damages
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
IS Innovative Software Ltd
Appellant
Robert Howes
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Howes was liable for unlawful means conspiracy in relation to backdated employment contracts
- 2 Whether Mr Howes induced breach of contract or conspired to injure the company by procuring breaches by employees
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Howes was not liable for unlawful means conspiracy because he did not intend to injure the company and reasonably believed the backdated contracts reflected existing agreements; he was not liable for inducing breach of contract or conspiracy as the evidence did not establish that employees breached their contracts or that Mr Howes procured such breaches.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal by IS Innovative Software Ltd is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment