Isabel Dos Santos v Unitel S.A.
The correct merits threshold for freezing injunctions is the Niedersachsen test, not the three-limb Brownlie test. Unitel satisfied this threshold based on expert evidence that filing the joinder application fulfilled Article 80(1) of the Angolan Commercial Companies Law. Costs should follow the event, given the contested nature and outcome of the application.
- Parties
- Appellant: Isabel dos Santos; Respondent: Unitel S.A.
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 March 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment Granting Worldwide Freezing Order
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Worldwide Freezing Orders, Good Arguable Case Test, Costs of Interim Applications, Foreign Law Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Isabel dos Santos
Appellant
Unitel S.A.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment Granting Worldwide Freezing Order
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the correct test for 'good arguable case' in freezing injunction applications?
- 2 Did Unitel satisfy the merits threshold for a freezing injunction against Ms dos Santos under Angolan law?
- 3 Is there a general rule that costs of a freezing order application should be reserved?
Ratio Decidendi
The correct merits threshold for freezing injunctions is the Niedersachsen test, not the three-limb Brownlie test. Unitel satisfied this threshold based on expert evidence that filing the joinder application fulfilled Article 80(1) of the Angolan Commercial Companies Law. Costs should follow the event, given the contested nature and outcome of the application.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Worldwide Freezing Order against Ms dos Santos upheld
- Ms dos Santos to pay Unitel's costs of the freezing order application
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment