Joyvio Group Co, Ltd & Ors v Isidoro Ernesto Quiroga Moreno & Ors
Chile is an available and distinctly more appropriate forum for the claims. The Defendants' submission to Chilean jurisdiction and undertakings to waive limitation defences remove any real risk of injustice or time-bar. The English proceedings are stayed in favour of Chilean proceedings, subject to undertakings.
- Parties
- Claimant: Joyvio Group Co., Ltd.; Claimant: BJ Joyvio Zhencheng Technology Co., Ltd.; Claimant: Food Investments SPA; Claimant: Australis Seafoods S. A.; Claimant: Australis Mar S. A.; Claimant: Acuícola Cordillera Limitada; Claimant: Salmones Islas del Sur Limitada; Claimant: Salmones Alpen Limitada; Claimant: Procesadora de Alimentos Australis SPA; Defendant: Isidoro Ernesto Quiroga Moreno; Defendant: Isidoro Alfonso Quiroga Cortés; Defendant: Benjamín Quiroga Cortés; Defendant: Martín Guiloff Salvador
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 March 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Application / Ruling on Forum Non Conveniens Stay
- Outcome
- Application granted; proceedings stayed in favour of Chilean forum.
- Legal Topics
- Forum Non Conveniens, Jurisdiction, Limitation Periods, Cross Border Litigation, Stay of Proceedings, Submission to Jurisdiction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joyvio Group Co., Ltd.
Claimant
BJ Joyvio Zhencheng Technology Co., Ltd.
Claimant
Food Investments SPA
Claimant
Australis Seafoods S. A.
Claimant
Australis Mar S. A.
Claimant
Acuícola Cordillera Limitada
Claimant
Salmones Islas del Sur Limitada
Claimant
Salmones Alpen Limitada
Claimant
Procesadora de Alimentos Australis SPA
Claimant
Isidoro Ernesto Quiroga Moreno
Defendant
Isidoro Alfonso Quiroga Cortés
Defendant
Benjamín Quiroga Cortés
Defendant
Martín Guiloff Salvador
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Application / Ruling on Forum Non Conveniens Stay
Legal Issues
- 1 Is Chile an available and more appropriate forum for the claims than England?
- 2 Do Chilean courts have jurisdiction and relative competence over the parties and claims?
- 3 Is there a real risk of the claims being time-barred in Chile?
Ratio Decidendi
Chile is an available and distinctly more appropriate forum for the claims. The Defendants' submission to Chilean jurisdiction and undertakings to waive limitation defences remove any real risk of injustice or time-bar. The English proceedings are stayed in favour of Chilean proceedings, subject to undertakings.
Court Disposition
Application granted; proceedings stayed in favour of Chilean forum.
Orders
- Stay of English proceedings granted on condition Defendants submit to Chilean jurisdiction and waive limitation defences accruing between issue of English claim and any Chilean claim.
- First Defendant's undertaking to submit to Chilean jurisdiction is qualified to preserve arbitration rights under SPA.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment