Jones v Isleworth Crown Court

Jones v Isleworth Crown Court

The judge was entitled to conclude, based on the escalation of violence, psychiatric evidence of paranoid schizophrenia with hallucinations commanding harm, and the claimant's history, that there was a risk of serious harm to the public justifying a restriction order.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Claimant: Evan Dewi Jones; Defendant: Isleworth Crown Court
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
02 March 2005
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Outcome
Application for judicial review dismissed
Legal Topics
Restriction Orders, Hospital Orders, Judicial Review, Serious Harm, Insanity and Unfitness to Plead
Criminal Law Mental Health Law Restriction Orders Hospital Orders Judicial Review Serious Harm Insanity and Unfitness to Plead

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Evan Dewi Jones

Claimant

Isleworth Crown Court

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there was evidence entitling the judge to conclude that the claimant presented a risk of serious harm to the public justifying a restriction order

Ratio Decidendi

The judge was entitled to conclude, based on the escalation of violence, psychiatric evidence of paranoid schizophrenia with hallucinations commanding harm, and the claimant's history, that there was a risk of serious harm to the public justifying a restriction order.

Court Disposition

Application for judicial review dismissed

Orders

  • Application for judicial review dismissed
  • Legal aid taxation (certificate) granted to claimant's advocate