Attorney General v Bhamjee [2003] EWHC 3114 (Admin) (08 December 2003)
Mr Bhamjee has habitually, persistently, and without reasonable ground instituted vexatious civil proceedings and applications, fulfilling the statutory preconditions for a civil proceedings order under section 42 of the Supreme Court Act 1981. The court's discretion is properly exercised in making an order without time limit to prevent further abuse.
- Citation
- [2003] EWHC 3114 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Her Majesty's Attorney General; Defendant: Ismail Bhamjee
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 December 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Civil Proceedings Order / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- civil proceedings order made against Mr Bhamjee without time limit; leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Vexatious Litigation, Civil Restraint Orders, Abuse of Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty's Attorney General
Claimant
Ismail Bhamjee
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Civil Proceedings Order / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Bhamjee has habitually, persistently and without reasonable ground instituted vexatious civil proceedings or made vexatious applications
- 2 Whether a civil proceedings order under section 42 of the Supreme Court Act 1981 should be made
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Bhamjee has habitually, persistently, and without reasonable ground instituted vexatious civil proceedings and applications, fulfilling the statutory preconditions for a civil proceedings order under section 42 of the Supreme Court Act 1981. The court's discretion is properly exercised in making an order without time limit to prevent further abuse.
Court Disposition
civil proceedings order made against Mr Bhamjee without time limit; leave to appeal refused
Orders
- Civil proceedings order under section 42 Supreme Court Act 1981 against Mr Bhamjee without time limit
- Leave to appeal to House of Lords refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment