Kazakhstan v Istil Group Inc [2007] EWHC 2729 (Comm) (21 November 2007)

Kazakhstan v Istil Group Inc [2007] EWHC 2729 (Comm) (21 November 2007)

The court held that the arbitral tribunal lacked substantive jurisdiction over the dispute as the Republic of Kazakhstan was not a party to the arbitration agreement, and this had already been determined by the French courts, creating an issue estoppel. The Partial Award on jurisdiction was no longer effective, having been overtaken by subsequent events and the tribunal's own reconsideration. The court granted the injunction restraining ISTIL from pursuing further arbitration proceedings.

Citation
[2007] EWHC 2729 (Comm)
Parties
Claimant: The Republic of Kazakhstan; Defendant: ISTIL Group Inc
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
21 November 2007
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Application for Injunction / Judgment on Application for Injunction Restraining Further Arbitration Proceedings
Outcome
Injunction granted; defendant restrained from pursuing further arbitration proceedings against claimant.
Legal Topics
Anti Suit Injunctions, Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunals, Res Judicata, State Immunity, Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
Arbitration International Law Commercial Law Anti Suit Injunctions Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunals Res Judicata State Immunity Enforcement of Arbitral Awards

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Republic of Kazakhstan

Claimant

ISTIL Group Inc

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Court Application for Injunction / Judgment on Application for Injunction Restraining Further Arbitration Proceedings

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the court should grant an injunction restraining the defendant from pursuing further arbitration proceedings against the claimant
  2. 2 Whether the arbitral tribunal had substantive jurisdiction over the dispute
  3. 3 Whether previous court and arbitral decisions created issue estoppel or res judicata

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the arbitral tribunal lacked substantive jurisdiction over the dispute as the Republic of Kazakhstan was not a party to the arbitration agreement, and this had already been determined by the French courts, creating an issue estoppel. The Partial Award on jurisdiction was no longer effective, having been overtaken by subsequent events and the tribunal's own reconsideration. The court granted the injunction restraining ISTIL from pursuing further arbitration proceedings.

Court Disposition

Injunction granted; defendant restrained from pursuing further arbitration proceedings against claimant.

Orders

  • ISTIL Group Inc is restrained from pursuing any further proceedings in respect of claims advanced against the Republic of Kazakhstan in LCIA Arbitration No. 1305.
  • ISTIL to pay the Republic of Kazakhstan's costs of the application.