ITV Services Ltd v Revenue And Customs [2013] EWCA Civ 867 (23 July 2013)
The Court held that the correct interpretation of 'salary' under paragraph 5A requires that the payment be computed by reference to the amount of time for which work has actually been performed, not merely by reference to contractual availability or other services. Payments that buy out availability or intellectual...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] EWCA Civ 867
- Parties
- Appellant: ITV Services Limited; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 July 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division) on Appeal From Upper Tribunal (tax and Chancery Chamber)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- National Insurance Contributions, Employment Status of Entertainers, Interpretation of Social Security (categorisation of Earners) Regulations 1978, Definition of 'salary' for Nics, Collective Agreements in Entertainment Industry
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
ITV Services Limited
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division) on Appeal From Upper Tribunal (tax and Chancery Chamber)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether actors engaged by ITV under certain contracts are 'employed earners' for National Insurance purposes under the Social Security (Categorisation of Earners) Regulations 1978 as amended
- 2 Whether payments made to actors include 'any payment by way of salary' within the meaning of paragraph 5A of Schedule 1 to the Regulations
- 3 Proper interpretation of 'salary' under paragraph 5A, especially condition (d): 'computed by reference to the amount of time for which work has been performed'
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the correct interpretation of 'salary' under paragraph 5A requires that the payment be computed by reference to the amount of time for which work has actually been performed, not merely by reference to contractual availability or other services. Payments that buy out availability or intellectual property rights, or are not computed by reference to time worked, do not constitute 'salary' for the purposes of the Regulations. However, where collective agreements are incorporated and provide for daily or periodical payments for work done, those payments do constitute 'salary'. Thus, actors whose contracts incorporate such provisions are 'employed earners' for NICs...
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- The appeal is allowed to the extent that only those actors whose contracts provide for payments computed by reference to time worked (including via incorporated collective agreements) are to be treated as 'employed earners' for NICs purposes; others are not.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment