Pagel & Anor v Farman

Pagel & Anor v Farman

Mr Farman failed to prove that he made the gift under a mistake of sufficient gravity or that retention of the gift by Mr Pagel would be unconscionable; the evidence and contemporaneous documents supported the respondent's case that the gift was a goodwill gesture, not a response to financial distress or misrepresentation.

Parties
Claimant: Scott Pagel; 2nd Claimant: Gradient Capital Partners LLP; Defendant: Ivor Farman
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 July 2013
Procedural Posture
Commercial Dispute / Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Counterclaim dismissed; claim dismissed.
Legal Topics
Mistake in Gifts, Unconscionability, Partnership Disputes, Rescission of Gifts
Contract Law Equity Commercial Law Mistake in Gifts Unconscionability Partnership Disputes Rescission of Gifts

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Scott Pagel

Claimant

Gradient Capital Partners LLP

2nd Claimant

Ivor Farman

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Dispute / Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a gift made by Mr Farman to Mr Pagel was recoverable on grounds of mistake
  2. 2 Whether the gift was made under a causative mistake of sufficient gravity
  3. 3 Whether retention of the gift would be unconscionable

Ratio Decidendi

Mr Farman failed to prove that he made the gift under a mistake of sufficient gravity or that retention of the gift by Mr Pagel would be unconscionable; the evidence and contemporaneous documents supported the respondent's case that the gift was a goodwill gesture, not a response to financial distress or misrepresentation.

Court Disposition

Counterclaim dismissed; claim dismissed.

Orders

  • If Mr Farman wishes to obtain life insurance for inheritance tax consequences and undergoes the medical, Mr Pagel should pay for it.
  • No order as to costs on the insurance issue.