Vector Investments v Williams [2009] EWHC 3601 (TCC) (05 November 2009)
Vector, as recipient of £750,000 plus VAT, is the successful party and entitled to costs up to 19 September 2007. Due to failure to negotiate and unintentional exaggeration, Vector is entitled to only 50% of its costs after that date. Williams' wasted costs application for disclosure is not granted.
- Citation
- [2009] EWHC 3601 (TCC)
- Parties
- Claimant: Vector Investments; Defendant: J. D. Williams
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 November 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Litigation (costs Determination) / Post Settlement, Costs Determination Following Tomlin Order
- Outcome
- Costs order in favour of Vector Investments, with reduction.
- Legal Topics
- Costs Determination, Settlement, Disclosure, Exaggeration of Claims, Offers to Settle
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Vector Investments
Claimant
J. D. Williams
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Litigation (costs Determination) / Post Settlement, Costs Determination Following Tomlin Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Which party is the successful party for costs purposes after settlement?
- 2 Effect of offers to settle on costs determination
- 3 Impact of conduct and exaggeration on costs orders
Ratio Decidendi
Vector, as recipient of £750,000 plus VAT, is the successful party and entitled to costs up to 19 September 2007. Due to failure to negotiate and unintentional exaggeration, Vector is entitled to only 50% of its costs after that date. Williams' wasted costs application for disclosure is not granted.
Court Disposition
Costs order in favour of Vector Investments, with reduction.
Orders
- Vector to recover its costs up to 19 September 2007.
- Vector to recover 50% of its costs after 19 September 2007.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment