Level 1 Raised Flooring Limited v JM Construction (SW) Limited
There was no enforceable adjudicator's decision for payment; the adjudicator only determined a valuation contingent on the lawfulness of termination and completion of the contractual procedure, not an entitlement to payment. The court cannot enforce a contingent or inchoate decision.
- Parties
- Claimant: Level 1 Raised Flooring Limited; Defendant: J M Construction (SW) Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Construction Adjudication Enforcement / Summary Judgment Application
- Outcome
- Application for summary judgment dismissed; claim susceptible to dismissal.
- Legal Topics
- Adjudication Enforcement, Summary Judgment, JCT Minor Works Contract, Termination of Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Level 1 Raised Flooring Limited
Claimant
J M Construction (SW) Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Construction Adjudication Enforcement / Summary Judgment Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the adjudicator's decision is enforceable as a binding decision for payment
- 2 Whether summary judgment should be granted to enforce the adjudicator's valuation
Ratio Decidendi
There was no enforceable adjudicator's decision for payment; the adjudicator only determined a valuation contingent on the lawfulness of termination and completion of the contractual procedure, not an entitlement to payment. The court cannot enforce a contingent or inchoate decision.
Court Disposition
Application for summary judgment dismissed; claim susceptible to dismissal.
Orders
- Summary judgment refused
- Claim susceptible to dismissal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment