J v K
The cumulative allegations of coercive and controlling behaviour by the father meet the Article 13(b) threshold for grave risk of psychological harm to Q. However, with specified protective measures in place—including financial support, accommodation, undertakings, and enforceable mirror orders—the risk can be sufficiently ameliorated to permit summary return.
- Parties
- Applicant: J; Respondent: K
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 August 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Child Abduction Summary Return Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Order for summary return of Q to Portugal with protective measures in place upon registration of mirror order in Portugal.
- Legal Topics
- Hague Convention 1980, Child Abduction and Custody Act 1985, Protective Measures, Coercive and Controlling Behaviour, Domestic Abuse, Article 13(b) Defence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
J
Applicant
K
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Child Abduction Summary Return Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the threshold for Article 13(b) of the 1980 Hague Convention is met for grave risk of harm or intolerable situation
- 2 Whether protective measures can sufficiently ameliorate risk to allow summary return of the child
Ratio Decidendi
The cumulative allegations of coercive and controlling behaviour by the father meet the Article 13(b) threshold for grave risk of psychological harm to Q. However, with specified protective measures in place—including financial support, accommodation, undertakings, and enforceable mirror orders—the risk can be sufficiently ameliorated to permit summary return.
Court Disposition
Order for summary return of Q to Portugal with protective measures in place upon registration of mirror order in Portugal.
Orders
- Q to be returned to Portugal forthwith upon registration of the order in Portugal.
- Protective measures to include €2,000 per month for rent, €1,500 per month for maintenance, provision of car, private health insurance, mobile phone contract, undertakings not to pursue criminal proceedings, not to attend at mother's address or airport, not to remove Q from mother's care, not to intimidate or...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment