A (Children) (Contact: Ultra-Orthodox Judaism: Transgender Parent)
Direct contact between the transgender parent and children is not in the children's best interests due to trauma, community opposition, and privacy concerns; indirect contact and narrative support are appropriate.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: JA; 1st Respondent: AM; 2nd Respondents: The children (acting by their Guardian)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 January 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application withdrawn; indirect contact and narrative support maintained; restrictions imposed on social media campaign.
- Legal Topics
- Child Contact, Transgender Rights, Religious Freedom, Privacy, Discrimination
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
JA
Applicant
AM
1st Respondent
The children (acting by their Guardian)
2nd Respondents
Procedural Posture
Family Law / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether contact between transgender parent and children should be permitted given religious and community opposition
- 2 Balancing rights under Articles 8, 9, 10, and 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights
- 3 Impact of contact on children's welfare
Ratio Decidendi
Direct contact between the transgender parent and children is not in the children's best interests due to trauma, community opposition, and privacy concerns; indirect contact and narrative support are appropriate.
Court Disposition
Application withdrawn; indirect contact and narrative support maintained; restrictions imposed on social media campaign.
Orders
- No direct contact between applicant and children
- Indirect contact permitted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment