Customs & Excise v Jack Baars Wholesale & Ors [2004] EWHC 18 (Ch) (16 January 2004)
There is a bona fide dispute on substantial grounds as to the civil liability for excise duty under Regulation 7(2), including its compatibility with EU law and its ultra vires status. The debt is not indisputable, and the proper forum for determination is the VAT and Duties Tribunal. Accordingly, winding up and bankruptcy orders are not made; the petitions are adjourned pending Tribunal appeals.
- Citation
- [2004] EWHC 18 (Ch)
- Parties
- Petitioner: HM Customs & Excise; Respondent: Jack Baars Wholesale; Respondent: Jack Baars; Respondent: Ann Carol Baars; Interested Party: Provisional Liquidator (Mr Kevin Goldfarb); Interested Party: Special Manager
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 January 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Insolvency (winding Up and Bankruptcy Petitions) / Interlocutory Judgment on Winding Up and Bankruptcy Petitions, Applications to Set Aside Statutory Demands, and Appointment of Provisional Liquidator/interim Receiver/special Manager
- Outcome
- Petitions for winding up and bankruptcy adjourned; no orders made for winding up or bankruptcy at this stage.
- Legal Topics
- Excise Duty Liability, VAT Liability, Insolvent Partnerships Order 1994, Statutory Demands, Civil Liability Under EU Directives, Ultra Vires Regulations, Procedural Irregularity
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
HM Customs & Excise
Petitioner
Jack Baars Wholesale
Respondent
Jack Baars
Respondent
Ann Carol Baars
Respondent
Provisional Liquidator (Mr Kevin Goldfarb)
Interested Party
Special Manager
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Insolvency (winding Up and Bankruptcy Petitions) / Interlocutory Judgment on Winding Up and Bankruptcy Petitions, Applications to Set Aside Statutory Demands, and Appointment of Provisional Liquidator/interim Receiver/special Manager
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Jack Baars Wholesale and its partners are civilly liable for excise duty and VAT under UK regulations implementing EU law
- 2 Whether Regulation 7(2) of the Excise Duty Points Regulations 2001 is ultra vires or incompatible with Council Directive 92/12/EEC
- 3 Whether the debt is bona fide disputed on substantial grounds so as to bar winding up and bankruptcy orders
Ratio Decidendi
There is a bona fide dispute on substantial grounds as to the civil liability for excise duty under Regulation 7(2), including its compatibility with EU law and its ultra vires status. The debt is not indisputable, and the proper forum for determination is the VAT and Duties Tribunal. Accordingly, winding up and bankruptcy orders are not made; the petitions are adjourned pending Tribunal appeals.
Court Disposition
Petitions for winding up and bankruptcy adjourned; no orders made for winding up or bankruptcy at this stage.
Orders
- Adjournment of winding up and bankruptcy petitions pending Tribunal appeals
- Provisional Liquidator, Interim Receiver, and Special Manager to remain in office
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment