Customs & Excise v Jack Baars Wholesale & Ors
The debt claimed by HM Customs & Excise is bona fide disputed on substantial grounds due to genuine triable issues regarding the compatibility of Regulation 7(2) with EU law and the scope of civil liability for excise duty; therefore, winding up and bankruptcy orders cannot be made at this stage and all matters are adjourned pending determination of the underlying debt by the Tribunal.
- Parties
- Petitioner: HM Customs & Excise; Respondent: Jack Baars Wholesale; Respondent: Jack Baars; Respondent: Ann Carol Baars; Interested Party: Provisional Liquidator (Mr Kevin Goldfarb); Interested Party: Special Manager
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 January 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Insolvency Proceedings / Interlocutory Judgment on Winding Up and Bankruptcy Petitions
- Outcome
- adjourned
- Legal Topics
- Excise Duty Liability, Statutory Demands, Joint and Several Liability, Winding Up, Bankruptcy, Civil Liability Under EU Directives
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
HM Customs & Excise
Petitioner
Jack Baars Wholesale
Respondent
Jack Baars
Respondent
Ann Carol Baars
Respondent
Provisional Liquidator (Mr Kevin Goldfarb)
Interested Party
Special Manager
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Insolvency Proceedings / Interlocutory Judgment on Winding Up and Bankruptcy Petitions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Jack Baars Wholesale and its partners are jointly and severally liable for excise duty under UK regulations implementing EU law
- 2 Whether the debt claimed by HM Customs & Excise is bona fide disputed on substantial grounds
- 3 Whether Regulation 7(2) of the Excise Duty Points Regulations 2001 is ultra vires or incompatible with EU law
Ratio Decidendi
The debt claimed by HM Customs & Excise is bona fide disputed on substantial grounds due to genuine triable issues regarding the compatibility of Regulation 7(2) with EU law and the scope of civil liability for excise duty; therefore, winding up and bankruptcy orders cannot be made at this stage and all matters are adjourned pending determination of the underlying debt by the Tribunal.
Court Disposition
adjourned
Orders
- All five matters adjourned generally pending Tribunal determination of underlying debt
- Provisional Liquidator, Interim Receiver, and Special Manager to remain in office
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment