R v Jack Davies
The judge was entitled to find there was sufficient evidence for the case to go to the jury on manslaughter under joint enterprise, including Davies' participation and knowledge of the knife. The summing-up was fair, and the sentence imposed was within the proper range and not manifestly excessive.
- Parties
- Applicant: Jack Davies; Respondent: Regina (Rex)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 May 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal against conviction and sentence refused
- Legal Topics
- Manslaughter, Joint Enterprise, Appeal Against Conviction, Appeal Against Sentence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jack Davies
Applicant
Regina (Rex)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was sufficient evidence for the case to answer against Davies for manslaughter under joint enterprise principles
- 2 Whether the trial judge's summing-up was fair and balanced
- 3 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive or wrongly categorized
Ratio Decidendi
The judge was entitled to find there was sufficient evidence for the case to go to the jury on manslaughter under joint enterprise, including Davies' participation and knowledge of the knife. The summing-up was fair, and the sentence imposed was within the proper range and not manifestly excessive.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal against conviction and sentence refused
Orders
- Leave to appeal against conviction refused
- Leave to appeal against sentence refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment