Harvey, R. v (Rev 1)

Harvey, R. v (Rev 1)

VAT collected forms part of the benefit and is not deductible; partial restoration of stolen property does not reduce the assessed benefit; the method of assessment based on percentage of turnover was proper; the term in default should be reduced to eight years to secure compliance with the confiscation order.

Parties
Respondent: Regina; Appellant: Jack Frederick Leonard Harvey
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
03 July 2013
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Confiscation Order
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part; confiscation order upheld; term in default reduced.
Legal Topics
Confiscation Order, Criminal Lifestyle, Benefit Assessment, VAT Treatment, Restoration of Stolen Property, Method of Assessment, Term in Default

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 21 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 10
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Respondent

Jack Frederick Leonard Harvey

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Confiscation Order

  1. 1 Whether VAT should be deducted from turnover in benefit assessment
  2. 2 Whether credit should be given for restoration of stolen property
  3. 3 Whether the method of assessment of benefit was proper

Ratio Decidendi

VAT collected forms part of the benefit and is not deductible; partial restoration of stolen property does not reduce the assessed benefit; the method of assessment based on percentage of turnover was proper; the term in default should be reduced to eight years to secure compliance with the confiscation order.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part; confiscation order upheld; term in default reduced.

Orders

  • Confiscation order in the sum of £2,275,454.40 upheld.
  • Term of imprisonment in default reduced from ten years to eight years.