Bournemouth, Christchurch & Poole Council (BCP Council) v Perryman [2020] EW Misc 19 (CC) (18 August 2020)

The threshold for a custodial penalty was easily passed due to the seriousness of the breach and its context; a 9-month prison sentence was imposed, reduced for admission and time spent in custody, with consideration for Covid-19 restrictions.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2020] EW Misc 19 (CC)
Parties: Claimant: Bournemouth, Christchurch & Poole Council (BCP Council); Defendant: Jack Perryman
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Judgment Date: 18 August 2020
Procedural Posture: Civil / Sentencing
Outcome: defendant sentenced to 9 months imprisonment for breach of injunction
Legal Topics: Antisocial Behaviour Injunction, Breach of Injunction, County Lines, Sentencing

Civil Procedure Public Order Antisocial Behaviour Injunction Breach of Injunction County Lines Sentencing

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4

Parties

Bournemouth, Christchurch & Poole Council (BCP Council)

Claimant

Jack Perryman

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Sentencing

Legal Issues

1 breach of antisocial behaviour injunction
2 appropriate sentence for breach
3 impact of county lines operations

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

defendant sentenced to 9 months imprisonment for breach of injunction

Orders

defendant to serve 9 months imprisonment, of which one half will be served
local authority's application to vary the injunction order adjourned; local authority to indicate within 14 days if they pursue the application

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.