VGC Construction Ltd v Jackson Civil Engineering Ltd

VGC Construction Ltd v Jackson Civil Engineering Ltd

The adjudicator had jurisdiction to decide the dispute regarding the final account, including the delay and disruption claim, as the claim was not withdrawn, was not so nebulous as to preclude a dispute, and the introduction of the Hudson formula calculation in the Reply did not deprive the adjudicator of jurisdiction. The respondent's submissions did not amount to a clear reservation of jurisdictional objection.

Parties
Claimant: VGC Construction Limited; Defendant: Jackson Civil Engineering Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
15 August 2008
Procedural Posture
Summary Judgment Application for Enforcement of Adjudicator's Decision / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the claimant; enforcement of adjudicator's decision upheld.
Legal Topics
Adjudication Enforcement, Jurisdiction of Adjudicator, Delay and Disruption Claims, Extension of Time, Summary Judgment
Construction Law Contract Law Civil Procedure Adjudication Enforcement Jurisdiction of Adjudicator Delay and Disruption Claims Extension of Time Summary Judgment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

VGC Construction Limited

Claimant

Jackson Civil Engineering Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Summary Judgment Application for Enforcement of Adjudicator's Decision / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the adjudicator had jurisdiction to decide the delay and disruption claim
  2. 2 Whether the delay and disruption claim was withdrawn or held in abeyance
  3. 3 Whether the claim was so nebulous and ill-defined as to be incapable of giving rise to a dispute

Ratio Decidendi

The adjudicator had jurisdiction to decide the dispute regarding the final account, including the delay and disruption claim, as the claim was not withdrawn, was not so nebulous as to preclude a dispute, and the introduction of the Hudson formula calculation in the Reply did not deprive the adjudicator of jurisdiction. The respondent's submissions did not amount to a clear reservation of jurisdictional objection.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the claimant; enforcement of adjudicator's decision upheld.

Orders

  • Judgment in favour of VGC Construction Limited for the sums claimed as per the adjudicator's decision.
  • Jackson Civil Engineering Limited to pay the adjudicator's fees.