Ezair v Conn & Anor

Ezair v Conn & Anor

CSP did not acquire a beneficial interest in the properties enforceable against Mr Ezair without compliance with the contractual notice provisions. The benefit of the 1999 Agreement was not assigned to CSP prior to judgment, and the s.234 procedure cannot be used to obtain specific performance of property transfer...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: Jacob Azouri Ezair; Respondent (joint Administrator of Charlotte Street Properties Limited): Stephen Leonard Conn; Respondent (joint Administrator of Charlotte Street Properties Limited): Jonathan Avery-Gee
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
01 June 2020
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment on Application Under S.234 Insolvency Act 1986
Outcome
Appeal allowed; s.234 application dismissed
Legal Topics
Bare Trusts, Specific Performance, Assignment of Contract, Summary Procedure Under Insolvency Act, Beneficial Ownership of Property, Notice Requirements in Property Contracts
Insolvency Law Property Law Equity Bare Trusts Specific Performance Assignment of Contract Summary Procedure Under Insolvency Act Beneficial Ownership of Property +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jacob Azouri Ezair

Appellant

Stephen Leonard Conn

Respondent (joint Administrator of Charlotte Street Properties Limited)

Jonathan Avery-Gee

Respondent (joint Administrator of Charlotte Street Properties Limited)

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment on Application Under S.234 Insolvency Act 1986

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether CSP acquired a beneficial interest in the properties enforceable against Mr Ezair without service of contractual notice
  2. 2 Whether the benefit of the 1999 Agreement was assigned to CSP
  3. 3 Whether the s.234 Insolvency Act procedure can be used to obtain specific performance of property transfer

Ratio Decidendi

CSP did not acquire a beneficial interest in the properties enforceable against Mr Ezair without compliance with the contractual notice provisions. The benefit of the 1999 Agreement was not assigned to CSP prior to judgment, and the s.234 procedure cannot be used to obtain specific performance of property transfer where contractual mechanisms have not been followed. Admissions in witness statements did not override the need for notice. The appeal is allowed and the s.234 application is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; s.234 application dismissed

Orders

  • Order of the High Court requiring transfer of properties to CSP set aside
  • No order for specific performance under s.234 Insolvency Act 1986