R v Jacqueline Marie Stewart
The applicant had been given a reasonable opportunity to make representations regarding her interest in the property during the section 10A determination, and there was no serious risk of injustice in binding the court to that determination. The fresh evidence sought to be admitted was not relevant or sufficient to...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Jacqueline Marie Stewart
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 November 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Receivership Order
- Outcome
- application for leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Receivership, Third Party Claims, Fresh Evidence, Confiscation Order, Appeal Procedure
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Jacqueline Marie Stewart
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Receivership Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant had a reasonable opportunity to make representations regarding her interest in the property
- 2 Whether there was a serious risk of injustice if the court was bound by the previous determination
- 3 Whether fresh evidence should be admitted on appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant had been given a reasonable opportunity to make representations regarding her interest in the property during the section 10A determination, and there was no serious risk of injustice in binding the court to that determination. The fresh evidence sought to be admitted was not relevant or sufficient to reopen the issue. Leave to appeal was refused.
Court Disposition
application for leave to appeal refused
Orders
- Leave to appeal against receivership order refused.
- Fresh evidence not admitted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment