Thompson v James [2014] EWCA Civ 600 (14 May 2014)
The natural and ordinary meaning of the appellant's blog posting was that Mr James was unlawfully and corruptly using public money for the benefit of himself and his cronies; this was defamatory of Mr James personally, not just the Council. The trial judge's finding on meaning was not wrong and the appeal is dismissed.
- Citation
- [2014] EWCA Civ 600
- Parties
- Appellant: Jacqueline Thompson; Respondent: Mark James
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 May 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (civil) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court (queen's Bench Division)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Libel, Meaning in Defamation, Honest Comment Defence, Freedom of Expression, Article 10 ECHR, Local Authority Powers, Indemnity for Officers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jacqueline Thompson
Appellant
Mark James
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal (civil) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court (queen's Bench Division)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the meaning attributed to the appellant's blog posting by the trial judge was correct in law
- 2 Whether the words used were defamatory of the respondent personally or of the Council
- 3 Whether the defence of honest comment was available
Ratio Decidendi
The natural and ordinary meaning of the appellant's blog posting was that Mr James was unlawfully and corruptly using public money for the benefit of himself and his cronies; this was defamatory of Mr James personally, not just the Council. The trial judge's finding on meaning was not wrong and the appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment