Gayle-Childs vTimmis & Anor

The claimant is the same individual as previous litigant Quinton Leslie Childs, was made bankrupt in August 2010, and thus any claims regarding the £100,000 payment are vested in the trustee in bankruptcy. The claims are unsustainable and totally without merit. A general civil restraint order is justified due to persistent groundless litigation.

Parties: Claimant: Q Leslie Gayle Childs / Quinton Leslie Gayle Childs / Leslie Gayle-Childs / Leslie Alphonso Gayle Childs; Defendant: Jacqueline Timmis; Defendant: Lesley-Ann Kenrick
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Judgment Date: 14 January 2013
Procedural Posture: Civil / Judgment on Applications to Strike Out and for Civil Restraint Order
Outcome: Claims struck out as totally without merit; general civil restraint order imposed for 2 years.
Legal Topics: Civil Restraint Orders, Strike Out Applications, Bankruptcy Vesting of Claims, Abuse of Process

Civil Procedure Bankruptcy Civil Restraint Orders Strike Out Applications Bankruptcy Vesting of Claims Abuse of Process

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6

Parties

Q Leslie Gayle Childs / Quinton Leslie Gayle Childs / Leslie Gayle-Childs / Leslie Alphonso Gayle Childs

Claimant

Jacqueline Timmis

Defendant

Lesley-Ann Kenrick

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment on Applications to Strike Out and for Civil Restraint Order

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimant is the same individual as previous litigant Quinton Leslie Childs
2 Whether the claims are vested in the trustee in bankruptcy
3 Whether the claims are totally without merit

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Claims struck out as totally without merit; general civil restraint order imposed for 2 years.

Orders

Both sets of proceedings struck out.
Claims categorised as totally without merit.