Society of Lloyd's v. Jaffray [2000] EWHC Commercial 174 (26th January, 2000)
Each non-UNO participant must contribute to UNO's legal costs based on disposable means, subject to a maximum cap, with detailed procedures for calculation, payment, withdrawal, and consequences for non-payment, ensuring fairness and access to justice.
- Citation
- [2000] EWHC Commercial 174
- Parties
- Claimant: Society of Lloyd's; Defendant: Jaffray
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Order / Interlocutory
- Outcome
- Costs-sharing order issued
- Legal Topics
- Costs Sharing, Contribution to Legal Costs, Legal Aid, Confidentiality Undertakings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Society of Lloyd's
Claimant
Jaffray
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Costs Order / Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 How should costs be equitably shared among claimants and counterclaimants not members of UNO?
- 2 What is the process for calculating and collecting contributions to UNO's legal costs?
- 3 What are the consequences for participants who fail to pay their contributions?
Ratio Decidendi
Each non-UNO participant must contribute to UNO's legal costs based on disposable means, subject to a maximum cap, with detailed procedures for calculation, payment, withdrawal, and consequences for non-payment, ensuring fairness and access to justice.
Court Disposition
Costs-sharing order issued
Orders
- Each participant to provide affidavit of means unless able to pay £17,000 without hardship
- Maximum pre-determination contribution per participant capped at £17,000 or disposable means, whichever is less
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment