Jaggard v Sawyer & Anor [1994] EWCA Civ 1 (18 July 1994)
The court held that the judge was entitled to refuse injunctions and award damages in lieu because the injury to the plaintiff's rights was small, could be estimated and compensated in money, and an injunction would be oppressive to the defendants. The Shelfer criteria were satisfied, and the Wrotham Park approach to damages was appropriate.
- Citation
- [1994] EWCA Civ 1
- Parties
- Appellant: Jaggard; Respondent: Sawyer and another
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 July 1994
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Injunctions, Damages in Lieu of Injunction, Trespass, Restrictive Covenants, Discretionary Equitable Remedies
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jaggard
Appellant
Sawyer and another
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should grant an injunction or award damages in lieu for continuing trespass and breach of covenant.
- 2 What principles govern the exercise of discretion to award damages instead of an injunction.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the judge was entitled to refuse injunctions and award damages in lieu because the injury to the plaintiff's rights was small, could be estimated and compensated in money, and an injunction would be oppressive to the defendants. The Shelfer criteria were satisfied, and the Wrotham Park approach to damages was appropriate.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; judgment of county court affirmed; damages in lieu of injunction to stand.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment