Harrison v Jagged Globe Ltd
The defendant owed no duty of care to the claimant in respect of the injuries suffered during the staged stunt, as the activity was not part of the contractual package, the guides were independent contractors, and there was no basis in contract or tort to impose liability on the defendant for the claimant's voluntary participation in an unforeseen activity.
- Parties
- Claimant: Natalie Harrison; Defendant: Jagged Globe Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 May 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Duty of Care, Vicarious Liability, Implied Contractual Terms, Package Travel Regulations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Natalie Harrison
Claimant
Jagged Globe Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant owed a duty of care to the claimant in respect of injuries suffered during a non-itinerary activity (staged stunt) on a mountaineering expedition.
- 2 Whether the defendant was vicariously liable for the negligence of independent contractor guides during activities outside the contractual package.
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant owed no duty of care to the claimant in respect of the injuries suffered during the staged stunt, as the activity was not part of the contractual package, the guides were independent contractors, and there was no basis in contract or tort to impose liability on the defendant for the claimant's voluntary participation in an unforeseen activity.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Judgment for the claimant set aside.
- No liability found against the defendant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment