Tierney-Campbell, R v

Tierney-Campbell, R v

The applicant's guilty plea was unequivocal, entered with full knowledge and proper advice, and there was overwhelming evidence of intent. No arguable merit exists for appeal or extension of time; conviction is not unsafe.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Applicant: Jake Tierney-Campbell; Respondent: Regina
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 September 2020
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Conviction
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal and extension of time dismissed.
Legal Topics
Guilty Plea, Unsafe Conviction, Legal Advice, Intent, Extension of Time
Criminal Law Guilty Plea Unsafe Conviction Legal Advice Intent Extension of Time

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 16 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jake Tierney-Campbell

Applicant

Regina

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant's guilty plea was equivocal or unsafe
  2. 2 Whether the applicant was properly advised regarding the consequences of his plea
  3. 3 Whether the conviction should be quashed and substituted with a lesser offence

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant's guilty plea was unequivocal, entered with full knowledge and proper advice, and there was overwhelming evidence of intent. No arguable merit exists for appeal or extension of time; conviction is not unsafe.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal and extension of time dismissed.

Orders

  • No extension of time granted.
  • Conviction stands; no substitution or quashing.