Jamal Uddin v Fakar Uddin
The appeal was allowed because the judge erred in law by finding a new constructive trust in favour of Fakar without identifying any detrimental reliance by Fakar after the Bisar; mere agreement to vary beneficial interests is insufficient without subsequent detrimental reliance.
- Parties
- Appellant: Jamal Uddin; Respondent: Fakar Uddin
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 January 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Trusts, Beneficial Ownership, Detrimental Reliance, Disposition of Equitable Interests
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jamal Uddin
Appellant
Fakar Uddin
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an oral agreement at a family meeting (Bisar) was sufficient to vary an express trust and make Fakar sole beneficial owner of the property
- 2 Whether detrimental reliance by Fakar was established to support the creation of a new constructive trust
- 3 Whether s.53(1)(c) Law of Property Act 1925 required written disposition of Jamal's beneficial interest
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was allowed because the judge erred in law by finding a new constructive trust in favour of Fakar without identifying any detrimental reliance by Fakar after the Bisar; mere agreement to vary beneficial interests is insufficient without subsequent detrimental reliance.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Matter to be remitted to the County Court for further determination on detrimental reliance or for consideration of sale and accounting between the parties; parties invited to agree an order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment