Spyridoula-Maria Armeniakou v James Alexander Scott Thomson
There is no evidence of heightened risk of inadvertent disclosure by the claimant's legal team; the confidentiality club should include the claimant's current solicitors and counsel, and worldwide asset information should be disclosed as ordered.
- Parties
- Claimant: Spyridoula-Maria Armeniakou; Defendant: James Alexander Scott Thomson
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Vary Interim Order / Interlocutory Hearing
- Outcome
- Application to vary interim order refused; original order stands pending Return Day.
- Legal Topics
- Freezing Orders, Asset Disclosure, Confidentiality Clubs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Spyridoula-Maria Armeniakou
Claimant
James Alexander Scott Thomson
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application to Vary Interim Order / Interlocutory Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant's asset disclosure should be limited to England and Wales or worldwide
- 2 Whether the claimant's legal team should be members of the confidentiality club
- 3 Risk of inadvertent disclosure by claimant's legal team
Ratio Decidendi
There is no evidence of heightened risk of inadvertent disclosure by the claimant's legal team; the confidentiality club should include the claimant's current solicitors and counsel, and worldwide asset information should be disclosed as ordered.
Court Disposition
Application to vary interim order refused; original order stands pending Return Day.
Orders
- Defendant to disclose worldwide asset information to confidentiality club including claimant's current legal team within 24 hours.
- Costs reserved.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment