Ibrams, R. v [1981] EWCA Crim 3 (27 July 1981)
There was no evidence of a sudden and temporary loss of self-control at the time of the killing; the killing was the result of a planned and deliberate act, not an impulsive reaction to provocation. Therefore, the trial judge was correct in not leaving the defence of provocation to the jury.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1981] EWCA Crim 3
- Parties
- Appellant: James David Ibrams; Appellant: Ian David Gregory; Respondent: The Crown; Co Defendant: Laura Andronik; Deceased: John Monk
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 July 1981
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Provocation, Loss of Self Control, Manslaughter, Appeal Procedure
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James David Ibrams
Appellant
Ian David Gregory
Appellant
The Crown
Respondent
Laura Andronik
Co Defendant
John Monk
Deceased
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in ruling there was no evidence of loss of self-control to leave to the jury under s.3 of the Homicide Act 1957
- 2 Whether gross impairment of judgment due to fear can amount to loss of self-control for the defence of provocation
Ratio Decidendi
There was no evidence of a sudden and temporary loss of self-control at the time of the killing; the killing was the result of a planned and deliberate act, not an impulsive reaction to provocation. Therefore, the trial judge was correct in not leaving the defence of provocation to the jury.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Leave to appeal granted
- Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment