King v Dubrey & Ors
The court found that June Fairbrother made a valid donatio mortis causa of the property to Mr King by handing him the deeds and expressing her intention that he should have the property upon her death. The requirements for a DMC were satisfied: June contemplated her impending death, the gift was conditional on her death, and she parted with dominion over the indicia of title. There was no sufficient evidence of lack of capacity. Alternatively, if the DMC claim failed, Mr King was a dependant under the 1975 Act and entitled to a lump sum provision.
- Parties
- Claimant: Kenneth Paul King; Defendant: James Dubrey; Defendant: Joan Dubery; Defendant: Trudy Manning; Defendant: June Davies; Defendant: Margaret von Hoensbroech; Defendant: Elizabeth Drorer; Defendant: Joan Copeman; Defendant: Jennifer Crosby; Defendant: Ivy Banks; Defendant: Elspeth Wotherspoon; Defendant: Ronald Archer; Defendant: Sally Archer; Defendant: Dorothy Cooper; Defendant: Mrs Woodstock; Defendant: The Chiltern Dog Rescue; Defendant: The Blue Cross Animal Shelter; Defendant: Redwings Horse Sanctuary; Defendant: The Donkey Sanctuary; Defendant: The International Fund for Animal Welfare; Defendant: The PDSA; Defendant: The World Society for the Protection of Animals
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 July 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Probate/inheritance Dispute / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim allowed
- Legal Topics
- Donatio Mortis Causa, Testamentary Capacity, Inheritance (provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975, Dependency Claims
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenneth Paul King
Claimant
James Dubrey
Defendant
Joan Dubery
Defendant
Trudy Manning
Defendant
June Davies
Defendant
Margaret von Hoensbroech
Defendant
Elizabeth Drorer
Defendant
Joan Copeman
Defendant
Jennifer Crosby
Defendant
Ivy Banks
Defendant
Elspeth Wotherspoon
Defendant
Ronald Archer
Defendant
Sally Archer
Defendant
Dorothy Cooper
Defendant
Mrs Woodstock
Defendant
The Chiltern Dog Rescue
Defendant
The Blue Cross Animal Shelter
Defendant
Redwings Horse Sanctuary
Defendant
The Donkey Sanctuary
Defendant
The International Fund for Animal Welfare
Defendant
The PDSA
Defendant
The World Society for the Protection of Animals
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Probate/inheritance Dispute / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a valid donatio mortis causa (DMC) of the property was made to the claimant
- 2 Whether the deceased had capacity to make a DMC
- 3 Whether the claimant was a dependant under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 and entitled to reasonable financial provision
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that June Fairbrother made a valid donatio mortis causa of the property to Mr King by handing him the deeds and expressing her intention that he should have the property upon her death. The requirements for a DMC were satisfied: June contemplated her impending death, the gift was conditional on her death, and she parted with dominion over the indicia of title. There was no sufficient evidence of lack of capacity. Alternatively, if the DMC claim failed, Mr King was a dependant under the 1975 Act and entitled to a lump sum provision.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed
Orders
- Declaration that Mr King is entitled to the property at 12 Kingscroft Road, Harpenden by valid donatio mortis causa. If this is incorrect, a lump sum of £75,000 is awarded to Mr King under the 1975 Act.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment