James Hall v The Commissioners for HMRC
A Joint and Several Liability Notice under Schedule 13 Finance Act 2020 is a criminal charge for Article 6 ECHR purposes. Accordingly, HMRC bears the burden of proof to establish the statutory conditions for issuing and maintaining the JSLN. The Tribunal has jurisdiction to consider public law arguments, including proportionality and irrationality, in determining whether the JSLN should be set aside. Grounds 4 and 5 are not so unarguable as to warrant strike out at this stage.
- Parties
- Appellant: James Hall; Respondents: The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 January 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / Interlocutory Applications—burden of Proof and Strike Out
- Outcome
- Appellant’s application allowed; HMRC’s strike out applications refused.
- Legal Topics
- Joint and Several Liability Notice, Burden of Proof, Article 6 ECHR, Proportionality, Jurisdiction of Tribunal, Strike Out Applications
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Hall
Appellant
The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / Interlocutory Applications—burden of Proof and Strike Out
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a Joint and Several Liability Notice (JSLN) is a criminal charge for Article 6 ECHR purposes
- 2 Who bears the burden of proof in a JSLN appeal
- 3 Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear public law arguments (proportionality, irrationality, failure to follow guidance)
Ratio Decidendi
A Joint and Several Liability Notice under Schedule 13 Finance Act 2020 is a criminal charge for Article 6 ECHR purposes. Accordingly, HMRC bears the burden of proof to establish the statutory conditions for issuing and maintaining the JSLN. The Tribunal has jurisdiction to consider public law arguments, including proportionality and irrationality, in determining whether the JSLN should be set aside. Grounds 4 and 5 are not so unarguable as to warrant strike out at this stage.
Court Disposition
Appellant’s application allowed; HMRC’s strike out applications refused.
Orders
- Directions of 13 March 2025 set aside and replaced with those proposed by the Appellant, subject to agreement on dates within 7 days.
- HMRC to serve witness evidence and skeleton argument first.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment