James Haslam v The Information Commissioner

James Haslam v The Information Commissioner

Ofsted was entitled to rely on section 33(2) FOIA because disclosure of the evidence forms and notes before publication of the final inspection report would be likely to prejudice the effective exercise of its audit functions. The public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: James Haslam; Respondent: The Information Commissioner
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
25 November 2024
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Freedom of Information, Audit Functions, Public Interest Exemption
Information Law Administrative Law Freedom of Information Audit Functions Public Interest Exemption

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James Haslam

Appellant

The Information Commissioner

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Ofsted was entitled to rely on section 33(2) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 to withhold inspection evidence forms and notes
  2. 2 Whether the public interest in disclosure outweighed the interest in maintaining the exemption

Ratio Decidendi

Ofsted was entitled to rely on section 33(2) FOIA because disclosure of the evidence forms and notes before publication of the final inspection report would be likely to prejudice the effective exercise of its audit functions. The public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosure at the time of the request.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed