REGINA v JAMES LONG

REGINA v JAMES LONG

The conviction was quashed because the identification evidence linking the appellant to the third attacker was fundamentally flawed, the submission of no case to answer should have been upheld, and the use of an equivalent of a dock identification rendered the trial unfair.

Parties
Appellant: James Long; Respondent: Regina
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 March 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
conviction quashed
Legal Topics
Robbery, Identification Evidence, Dock Identification, Unsafe Conviction
Criminal Law Robbery Identification Evidence Dock Identification Unsafe Conviction

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James Long

Appellant

Regina

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the submission of no case to answer should have been upheld
  2. 2 Whether the appellant was wrongly identified by way of a dock identification

Ratio Decidendi

The conviction was quashed because the identification evidence linking the appellant to the third attacker was fundamentally flawed, the submission of no case to answer should have been upheld, and the use of an equivalent of a dock identification rendered the trial unfair.

Court Disposition

conviction quashed