Hirschfeld v McGrath [2011] EWHC 249 (QB) (15 February 2011)
Anonymity order not continued because the risk of press intrusion does not justify derogation from open justice; undertakings by Defendant sufficiently protect Claimant's confidentiality without need for anonymity.
- Citation
- [2011] EWHC 249
- Parties
- Claimant: Stephanie Hirschfeld; Defendant: James McGrath
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 February 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Injunction Application / Return Date Hearing
- Outcome
- Anonymity order not continued; Defendant's undertakings accepted.
- Legal Topics
- Confidentiality, Anonymity Orders, Publication Restraint
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stephanie Hirschfeld
Claimant
James McGrath
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Injunction Application / Return Date Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to continue anonymity order
- 2 Scope of restraint on publication of confidential information
Ratio Decidendi
Anonymity order not continued because the risk of press intrusion does not justify derogation from open justice; undertakings by Defendant sufficiently protect Claimant's confidentiality without need for anonymity.
Court Disposition
Anonymity order not continued; Defendant's undertakings accepted.
Orders
- Defendant restrained from publishing, republishing, syndicating, using, communicating or disclosing information concerning the intimate former relationship, family life, and Claimant's health, except as contained in public judgment or Confidential Schedule.
- Defendant permitted to disclose information to legal advisers, for purposes of carrying out order, or if information is in public domain due to national media publication.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment