Routledge, R. v [2022] EWCA Crim 1839 (22 November 2022)

Routledge, R. v [2022] EWCA Crim 1839 (22 November 2022)

The custodial part of the sentence was neither too long nor wrong in principle. The judge was entitled to treat count 8 as the lead offence and impose a sentence above the category range in light of the other two rapes. The appellant's age and personal circumstances did not provide strong mitigation given the seriousness and repeat nature of the offending.

Citation
[2022] EWCA Crim 1839
Parties
Prosecution: Rex; Appellant: James Routledge
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
22 November 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Rape, Sentencing, Extended Sentence, Totality Principle, Mitigation
Criminal Law Rape Sentencing Extended Sentence Totality Principle Mitigation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

James Routledge

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed was excessive
  2. 2 Whether the judge failed to consider the appellant's age, maturity, and personal circumstances
  3. 3 Whether the principle of totality was properly applied

Ratio Decidendi

The custodial part of the sentence was neither too long nor wrong in principle. The judge was entitled to treat count 8 as the lead offence and impose a sentence above the category range in light of the other two rapes. The appellant's age and personal circumstances did not provide strong mitigation given the seriousness and repeat nature of the offending.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed