James Turner v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government & Anor

James Turner v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government & Anor

The statutory requirement to serve occupiers under s.172 is satisfied by affixing the enforcement notice conspicuously to the entrance gates of the land where the notice relates to the whole planning unit. The Inspector made no error in law in so finding. There was no substantial prejudice to occupiers as none participated despite being aware of the proceedings, and the refusal of costs was justified.

Parties
Appellant: James Turner; First Respondent: Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government; Second Respondent: Buckinghamshire Council
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
31 October 2025
Procedural Posture
Statutory Appeal Under S.289 Town and Country Planning Act 1990 / High Court Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Service of Enforcement Notices, Statutory Interpretation, Substantial Prejudice, Costs in Planning Appeals
Planning Law Administrative Law Service of Enforcement Notices Statutory Interpretation Substantial Prejudice Costs in Planning Appeals

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James Turner

Appellant

Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government

First Respondent

Buckinghamshire Council

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Statutory Appeal Under S.289 Town and Country Planning Act 1990 / High Court Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether service of an enforcement notice by affixing to entrance gates satisfies statutory requirements for service on occupiers under s.329(2) Town and Country Planning Act 1990
  2. 2 Whether failure to serve all occupiers caused substantial prejudice under s.176(5)
  3. 3 Whether the Inspector erred in refusing costs to the appellant

Ratio Decidendi

The statutory requirement to serve occupiers under s.172 is satisfied by affixing the enforcement notice conspicuously to the entrance gates of the land where the notice relates to the whole planning unit. The Inspector made no error in law in so finding. There was no substantial prejudice to occupiers as none participated despite being aware of the proceedings, and the refusal of costs was justified.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed on all grounds
  • No order as to costs in favour of appellant