James, R v

James, R v

In these exceptional circumstances, where all nine Lords of Appeal in Ordinary sitting in the Privy Council in Holley agreed that their majority decision definitively clarified the law of provocation in England, the Court of Appeal is justified in preferring Holley over the earlier House of Lords decision in Morgan Smith. The law of provocation is as stated in Holley: the objective standard is that of a person with ordinary powers of self-control, not one modified by all the defendant's characteristics.

Parties
Respondent: R; Appellant: James; Appellant: Karimi
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
25 January 2006
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
Appeals dismissed
Legal Topics
Homicide, Provocation, Precedent, Murder, Manslaughter
Criminal Law Homicide Provocation Precedent Murder Manslaughter

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 20 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

R

Respondent

James

Appellant

Karimi

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Court of Appeal should follow the decision of the Privy Council in Attorney General for Jersey v Holley or the House of Lords in R v Smith (Morgan) on the law of provocation as a partial defence to murder
  2. 2 Whether the rules of precedent allow the Court of Appeal to prefer a Privy Council decision over a House of Lords decision in exceptional circumstances

Ratio Decidendi

In these exceptional circumstances, where all nine Lords of Appeal in Ordinary sitting in the Privy Council in Holley agreed that their majority decision definitively clarified the law of provocation in England, the Court of Appeal is justified in preferring Holley over the earlier House of Lords decision in Morgan Smith. The law of provocation is as stated in Holley: the objective standard is that of a person with ordinary powers of self-control, not one modified by all the defendant's characteristics.

Court Disposition

Appeals dismissed

Orders

  • Appeals of James and Karimi dismissed
  • Application for permission to appeal to the House of Lords refused