R v Jamie Martin Dunn & Anor

R v Jamie Martin Dunn & Anor

The sentencing judge correctly applied the relevant guidelines, properly considered all aggravating and mitigating factors, and the sentences imposed were not manifestly excessive or wrong in principle. The impact on the applicants' children and their personal circumstances was adequately reflected in the sentences....

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Applicant: Jamie Martin Dunn; Applicant: Catalina Cojocaru; Respondent: Rex
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
applications for leave to appeal against sentence refused
Legal Topics
Modern Slavery, Trafficking, Controlling Prostitution, Money Laundering, Sentencing, Mitigation
Criminal Law Modern Slavery Trafficking Controlling Prostitution Money Laundering Sentencing Mitigation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jamie Martin Dunn

Applicant

Catalina Cojocaru

Applicant

Rex

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentencing judge gave sufficient weight to the agreed basis of plea and mitigating factors
  2. 2 Whether the sentences imposed were manifestly excessive or wrong in principle
  3. 3 Whether the impact of immediate custody on the applicants' children was adequately considered

Ratio Decidendi

The sentencing judge correctly applied the relevant guidelines, properly considered all aggravating and mitigating factors, and the sentences imposed were not manifestly excessive or wrong in principle. The impact on the applicants' children and their personal circumstances was adequately reflected in the sentences. The applications for leave to appeal against sentence are refused.

Court Disposition

applications for leave to appeal against sentence refused