R v Jamie Wilder

R v Jamie Wilder

There was ample material to justify the finding that the appellant was dangerous and the imposition of a life sentence was justified and required under section 285 of the Sentencing Code due to the seriousness of the offence and the inability to reliably estimate when the appellant would cease to be a danger to the public.

Parties
Appellant: Jamie Wilder; Respondent: Rex
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Dangerousness Assessment, Life Imprisonment, Arson, Conspiracy, Drug Offences
Criminal Law Sentencing Dangerousness Assessment Life Imprisonment Arson Conspiracy Drug Offences

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jamie Wilder

Appellant

Rex

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant was dangerous within the meaning of section 308 of the Sentencing Code
  2. 2 Whether the seriousness of the offence justified a sentence of imprisonment for life under section 285 of the Sentencing Code

Ratio Decidendi

There was ample material to justify the finding that the appellant was dangerous and the imposition of a life sentence was justified and required under section 285 of the Sentencing Code due to the seriousness of the offence and the inability to reliably estimate when the appellant would cease to be a danger to the public.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal against sentence dismissed.