Jane O’Connor v The Information Commissioner & Anor
At the relevant date, both executors of the deceased’s estate consented to disclosure and waived any claim for breach of confidence. Therefore, there was no actionable breach of confidence and section 41 FOIA was not engaged. The duty of confidence was owed to the estate, and the executors’ consent was sufficient to authorise disclosure.
- Parties
- Appellant: Jane O’Connor; First Respondent: The Information Commissioner; Second Respondent: Ministry of Defence
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (general Regulatory Chamber) Information Rights
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Information, Medical Records, Breach of Confidence, Executor Rights, Public Interest
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jane O’Connor
Appellant
The Information Commissioner
First Respondent
Ministry of Defence
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (general Regulatory Chamber) Information Rights
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 41 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 applies to withhold deceased's medical records when executors consent to disclosure
- 2 Whether disclosure would constitute an actionable breach of confidence
- 3 Whether the duty of confidence is owed to the estate and can be waived by executors
Ratio Decidendi
At the relevant date, both executors of the deceased’s estate consented to disclosure and waived any claim for breach of confidence. Therefore, there was no actionable breach of confidence and section 41 FOIA was not engaged. The duty of confidence was owed to the estate, and the executors’ consent was sufficient to authorise disclosure.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The Ministry of Defence must disclose the withheld information to the appellant within 35 days of the date of this decision.
- Any failure to comply may amount to contempt and may be certified to the Upper Tribunal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment