Hoare Trustees v Jaques & Ors [2008] EWHC 2022 (Ch) (06 February 2008)
The second codicil, by expressly referring to and varying the first will, demonstrated the testatrix's intention to revive the first will and first codicil and revoke the second will. The intention of the solicitor, acting on the testatrix's instructions, is attributed to the testatrix. There being no issue as to testamentary capacity or due execution, probate is granted in respect of the first will and two codicils.
- Citation
- [2008] EWHC 2022 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Hoare Trustees; Defendant: Jaques & Others
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 February 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Probate / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed
- Legal Topics
- Revival of Will, Testamentary Capacity, Due Execution, Codicil, Revocation of Will
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hoare Trustees
Claimant
Jaques & Others
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Probate / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the second codicil revived the first will and first codicil and revoked the second will
- 2 Whether the testatrix had testamentary capacity at the time of executing the second codicil
- 3 Whether the second codicil was duly executed
Ratio Decidendi
The second codicil, by expressly referring to and varying the first will, demonstrated the testatrix's intention to revive the first will and first codicil and revoke the second will. The intention of the solicitor, acting on the testatrix's instructions, is attributed to the testatrix. There being no issue as to testamentary capacity or due execution, probate is granted in respect of the first will and two codicils.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed
Orders
- Probate in solemn form granted in respect of the first will dated 12 August 1999 and the two codicils dated 14 January 2000 and 25 November 2004
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment