Dhami v Western Property (London Road) Ltd & Anor (First registration of lease - whether lease genuine - grant of leasehold easements- whether easements binding on transferee of servient land from receivers) [2025] UKFTT 1158 (PC) (22 September 2025)
The 13 July 2021 lease was genuinely executed and is registrable, but the leasehold easements (including the right to park) granted therein do not bind the First Respondent as transferee of the servient land because: (1) the lease was not registered within the statutory period and so only created equitable...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] UKFTT 1158 (PC)
- Parties
- Applicant: Jasit Singh Dhami; First Respondent: Western Property (London Road) Limited; Second Respondent: Terra Properties Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 September 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Land Registration Dispute / First Tier Tribunal (property Chamber) Decision
- Outcome
- Application to register lease allowed; easements not binding on First Respondent.
- Legal Topics
- First Registration of Lease, Genuineness of Lease, Leasehold Easements, Binding Effect of Easements on Transferee, Equitable Easements, Actual Occupation, Schedule 3 Land Registration Act 2002
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jasit Singh Dhami
Applicant
Western Property (London Road) Limited
First Respondent
Terra Properties Ltd
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Land Registration Dispute / First Tier Tribunal (property Chamber) Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 13 July 2021 lease was genuinely executed on that date
- 2 Whether leasehold easements granted in the lease bind the transferee of the servient land (First Respondent) after transfer by receivers
Ratio Decidendi
The 13 July 2021 lease was genuinely executed and is registrable, but the leasehold easements (including the right to park) granted therein do not bind the First Respondent as transferee of the servient land because: (1) the lease was not registered within the statutory period and so only created equitable easements; (2) the Applicant was not in actual occupation of the servient land at the relevant time; (3) any occupation was by the tenant AJM, not the Applicant personally; (4) the First Respondent had no actual knowledge of the Applicant's claimed rights and such occupation would not have been obvious on inspection; (5) the chargee's consent was not obtained, so the chargee and its...
Court Disposition
Application to register lease allowed; easements not binding on First Respondent.
Orders
- Chief Land Registrar to register the 13 July 2021 lease in favour of the Applicant.
- No entry to be made on the First Respondent's title (NGL 352309) regarding the easements in the lease.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment