Estera Trust (Jersey) Ltd v Singh & Ors
The court refused to order the respondents to participate in a buy-out structure involving a Jersey NewCo designed solely to avoid tax for the petitioners. The scheme could reasonably be regarded as aggressive tax avoidance, exposes the respondents to risk of HMRC scrutiny, and constitutes an unjustified interference with their rights. There is no public interest in compelling such a structure, and the petitioners have alternative means to mitigate tax. The court has jurisdiction but declines to exercise its discretion in favour of the petitioners.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Estera Trust (Jersey) Limited; Petitioner: Herinder Singh; Respondent: Jasminder Singh; Respondent: Verite Trust Company Limited; Respondent: Jemma Trust Company Limited; Respondent: Edwardian Group Limited; Respondent: Jasminder Singh and Herinder Singh (as trustees of the English Trusts)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 July 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Minority Shareholder Petition (unfair Prejudice) / Post Trial Application for Variation of Buy Out Order
- Outcome
- Petitioners' application for a tax-motivated buy-out structure refused
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Prejudice, Shareholder Buy Out, Tax Avoidance, Court Discretion Under Companies Act 2006 S.996
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Estera Trust (Jersey) Limited
Petitioner
Herinder Singh
Petitioner
Jasminder Singh
Respondent
Verite Trust Company Limited
Respondent
Jemma Trust Company Limited
Respondent
Edwardian Group Limited
Respondent
Jasminder Singh and Herinder Singh (as trustees of the English Trusts)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Minority Shareholder Petition (unfair Prejudice) / Post Trial Application for Variation of Buy Out Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should order a buy-out structure designed solely to avoid tax liability for the petitioners, against the wishes of the respondents
- 2 Whether the court has jurisdiction to vary the buy-out order to permit a transfer to a Jersey NewCo for tax purposes
- 3 Whether the proposed scheme constitutes aggressive tax avoidance and whether the court should compel unwilling parties to participate
Ratio Decidendi
The court refused to order the respondents to participate in a buy-out structure involving a Jersey NewCo designed solely to avoid tax for the petitioners. The scheme could reasonably be regarded as aggressive tax avoidance, exposes the respondents to risk of HMRC scrutiny, and constitutes an unjustified interference with their rights. There is no public interest in compelling such a structure, and the petitioners have alternative means to mitigate tax. The court has jurisdiction but declines to exercise its discretion in favour of the petitioners.
Court Disposition
Petitioners' application for a tax-motivated buy-out structure refused
Orders
- Petitioners' application for variation of the buy-out order to permit transfer to Jersey NewCo is dismissed.
- Buy-out to proceed as previously ordered, with short period allowed for petitioners to seek on-shoring clearance for the Lily Trust.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment