Vale v Armstrong & Anor
The transaction was procured by the undue influence of Mr Armstrong over Mr Vale, who reposed trust and confidence in Mr Armstrong. The transaction was manifestly disadvantageous to Mr Vale, and the defendants failed to rebut the presumption of undue influence. The transfer is voidable and must be set aside for breach of fiduciary and statutory duty.
- Parties
- Claimant: Henry Thomas Vale; Defendant: Jason Armstrong; Defendant: Terence Armstrong
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 May 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Transfer set aside as voidable for undue influence and breach of fiduciary duty. Further directions reserved pending submissions from interested mortgagee.
- Legal Topics
- Undue Influence, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Enduring Power of Attorney, Setting Aside Transactions, Constructive Trusts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Henry Thomas Vale
Claimant
Jason Armstrong
Defendant
Terence Armstrong
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the transfer of property by Mr Vale to Jason Armstrong should be set aside for undue influence
- 2 Whether Mr Armstrong breached fiduciary and statutory duties as attorney
- 3 Whether the transaction was manifestly disadvantageous to Mr Vale
Ratio Decidendi
The transaction was procured by the undue influence of Mr Armstrong over Mr Vale, who reposed trust and confidence in Mr Armstrong. The transaction was manifestly disadvantageous to Mr Vale, and the defendants failed to rebut the presumption of undue influence. The transfer is voidable and must be set aside for breach of fiduciary and statutory duty.
Court Disposition
Transfer set aside as voidable for undue influence and breach of fiduciary duty. Further directions reserved pending submissions from interested mortgagee.
Orders
- Transfer of property from Mr Vale to Jason Armstrong set aside, subject to submissions from Birmingham Midshires.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment